![]() |
| |||
|
Mediation > |
Property Settlement |
|||
|
Link to:
Whether it is prior to marriage, during marriage, or following the breakdown of your marriage Paul and Paul Lawyers can assist you to put in place an arrangement that will settle financial matters between you and your spouse on a final basis and provide you with your financial independence. Upon the breakdown of your marriage the adjustment of property interests is governed by Section 79 of the Family Law Act which is titled “Alteration of property interests”. Under this section the Court has a broad discretion to make orders adjusting the property interests of parties to a marriage where it is just and equitable. When making orders for adjustment of property interests the Court where possible does what it can to bring to an end any future financial relationship between the parties. The appropriate date for valuing the assets of the marriage is the date of the trial/court hearing not the date of separation, however the Judge does have a discretion to consider the financial history since separation before making a final determination. The Court’s power, which is discretionary, is governed by Section 79(4) of the Family Law Act. This is in the following terms: (4) In considering what order (if any) should be made under this section in property settlement proceedings, the court shall take into account:
In coming to a decision as to the alteration of property interests the Court adopts a 4 step approach, namely,
Of particular importance is Section 79(4)(e) which makes reference to what are commonly termed “Section 75(2) factors”. The Section 75(2) factors are the factors to be taken into account in any spouse maintenance order made by a Court and any order as to alteration of property interests. They are broadly concerned with a party’s needs and means following the breakdown of a marriage. Section 75(2) is in the following terms: (2) The matters to be so taken into account are:
ha. the effect of any proposed order on the ability of a creditor of a party to
Section 79(4) provides for the Court to look at the history of the marriage. The Court is required to assess the parties’ contributions, both financial and non-financial, to the acquisition and maintenance of property, and also to the general welfare of the family i.e. to the marriage generally. Section 79(4)(a) This includes any financial contribution directly or indirectly by or on behalf of a party to the marriage or a child of the marriage to the acquisition, conservation or improvement of any of the property of the parties to the marriage. Financial contributions are generally considered predominant in short marriages but it is generally the approach of the Court that in marriages of long duration the value of any initial contribution erodes over the years, especially when there are children. In evaluating the parties’ respective interests the Court will have regard to whether a party has made “special” or “extra” contributions. Such issues generally arise when a party comes to the marriage with considerable wealth or exercises superior entrepreneurial skills, or receives an inheritance, or gifts or loans from relatives. Superannuation is regarded as property and must be taken into account. Section 79(4)(b) The court also considers contributions of a non-financial nature. This includes unpaid labour to the improvement of property owned by the parties to a marriage. For example, physically carrying out renovations that have subsequently improved the value of a property, without payment. Section 79(4)(c) This provision is concerned with the contribution by a party to the marriage to the care and welfare of the family. In Wardman and Hudson (1978) FLC 90-466 the Full Court summarised this provision as follows: “Clearly in our view in considering what order is just and equitable under Section 79 it would be wholly inappropriate not to give full and significant regard to the ordinary situation in the community, namely, a situation where the wife directs herself, particularly during the period when the children are young, away from outside employment towards the conduct of the home and the rearing that in ordinary circumstances that is a contribution in every way ought to be equally equated to the efforts of the husband who is thus freed to pursue his direction outside employment”. This approach was expressly approved in the land-mark High Court and decision in Mallet in 1984.
The relevant matters are set out in Section 79(4)(d)-(g). These are additional factors that need to be taken into consideration by a Court when deciding what is a just and equitable division of property between the parties to a marriage. In having regard to these factors the Court looks at what further adjustment may need to be made to the percentage otherwise seen as appropriate, based on contributions in favour of a party to a marriage who can demonstrate that such an adjustment is required. An adjustment is often warranted in circumstances where one party to the marriage has remained out of the workforce and has attended to the needs and requirements of the family, and thus that person’s earning capacity and ability to obtain gainful employment has been affected, whilst the other party has had an opportunity to build his or her career. The most common ‘allowance’ is where one party has the primary care of young children. Spouse maintenance and property adjustment are closely related, however for more on spouse maintenance please see our link titled Spouse Maintenance.
The High Court has rejected the Family Court’s earlier approach that equality is the “starting point”. Each case must be decided on its own set of circumstances and due consideration given to Section 79(4), an evaluation of the parties’ respective financial and other contributions. It may also be appropriate for there to be a further adjustment having regard to the provisions of Section 75(2). Contact Paul and Paul Lawyers for advice on your rights and entitlement. Property issues may be settled by way of Consent Orders made by the Family Court or by a Binding Financial Agreement where the Court need not be involved. In either case each party is required to obtain independent legal advice.
When you have reached agreement with your spouse, your agreement can be formalised and made binding by applying to the Court for Consent Orders to be made. An Application for Consent Orders can seek orders in relation to:
Consent Orders have the same legal effect as Court Orders made after a Court hearing by the Family Court of Australia or the Federal Magistrates’ Court, but Consent Orders do not usually involve any Court appearance. A copy of your Marriage Certificate, or, if you are not married and are applying for parenting orders, a copy of your child or your children’s Birth Certificate(s) must accompany the Application for Consent Orders when lodged with the Court. There is no filing fee involved in making an Application for Consent Orders.
Apart from a Pre-Nuptial Agreement (made under Section 90B of the Family Law Act) there are 3 other types of BFA, namely:
You and your spouse are each required to be independently advised by a lawyer, each of whom must give a Certificate that independent legal advice has been provided to the client. The Certificates of Independent Legal Advice must each certify that you/your spouse have been advised as to:
What needs to be done to prepare a BFA? What is its effect? Return to TOP
Why choose a Binding Financial Agreement? Return to TOP
Contact Paul & Paul Lawyers directly for further information as to how we can help you with your Binding Financial Agreement. Complete the particulars and forward to us for review and advice. A small fee will apply. It is often a good idea to also enter into a Family Provision Act Deed of Release in which you and your former partner/spouse both release/waive your respective rights to seek provision out of the other’s estate upon the death of either of you.
|
||||
Paul & Paul Lawyers | L4 Bosch Chambers, 114-120 Castlereagh St, Sydney NSW 2000 | P: 02 9261 2233 | E: info@pplawyers.com.au
|
||||